Home Investment Doctor sues property adviser who recommended UK hotel investment that flopped, gets S$85,000

Doctor sues property adviser who recommended UK hotel investment that flopped, gets S$85,000

by Janessa Lee

Singapore Doctor Awarded Compensation After Property Investment Seminar Turns Sour

Investing in real estate can be a lucrative venture, but it also comes with its fair share of risks. For one doctor in Singapore, attending a property investment seminar ended in disappointment and financial loss. Dr. Lim Chong Teck, an ear, nose, and throat specialist, purchased a hotel unit in the United Kingdom after being persuaded by the seminar speaker, Wendy Kwek, who presented herself as a successful property investor. However, the investment did not yield the promised returns, leading Dr. Lim to sue Kwek for breach of duty of care. In a recent judgment, a Singapore district court awarded Dr. Lim approximately S$85,000 in compensation.

Dr. Lim was one of 85 plaintiffs who invested in the Tillington Hall Hotel project in Stafford, UK. Kwek introduced the investment opportunity to them during a series of property exhibitions in Singapore in 2013. According to Dr. Lim, Kwek assured attendees that she had conducted extensive due diligence on the project and emphasized its profitability. Convinced by her claims, Dr. Lim paid a deposit and the full purchase price for a hotel unit.

However, the project turned out to be unsuccessful, and Dr. Lim did not receive the promised returns. Over a five-year period, his investment did not even yield 7% annually, let alone the projected 14% after several years. In June 2021, the Tillington Hotel was sold at a loss, and Dr. Lim received a mere fraction of his original investment as his share of the proceeds.

Dr. Lim claimed that Kwek was liable for his losses due to her failure to conduct proper due diligence and provide adequate investment advice. He also argued that Kwek made fraudulent or negligent misrepresentations. In response, Kwek denied Dr. Lim’s claims and contended that the investment network formed during the seminar did not create any legal or contractual obligations.

The district court judge ruled that there was no contractual relationship between Dr. Lim and Kwek. However, she found that Kwek owed a duty of care to Dr. Lim under common law. The judge noted that Kwek had assumed personal responsibility for her statements during the seminar and had verbally assured attendees that she would source undervalued properties and assist them in selling the investments at a profit. Kwek had not warned attendees to conduct their own due diligence or seek professional advice. The judge concluded that Dr. Lim had proven his claim and awarded him damages of S$84,989.55.

This case serves as a reminder of the risks associated with property investments and the importance of conducting thorough due diligence. Investors should not solely rely on the claims made by seminar speakers or investment advisors. It is crucial to seek independent advice, thoroughly research investment opportunities, and carefully evaluate the risks involved. Additionally, attendees of investment seminars should be cautious of promises of guaranteed profits and evaluate the credibility and track record of the seminar speaker before making any investment decisions.

While this judgment provides some relief for Dr. Lim, it highlights the need for better regulation and stricter standards for property investment seminars and advisors. Authorities should consider implementing measures to ensure that investment advice is credible and accurate, protecting investors from potential losses and fraudulent schemes. Improved transparency and clearer guidelines can help safeguard the interests of investors and prevent similar incidents in the future.

related posts